← All posts

Burnout in Tech: What Nobody Tells Senior Engineers

10 min left

Burnout in Tech: What Nobody Tells Senior Engineers

You're not lazy or ungrateful. Tech burnout has specific drivers that most articles never talk about.

Alex Bancu
Alex Bancu10 min read

You're seven years in. Good comp. Respected by your team. You've shipped systems that handle millions of requests.

And you feel nothing.

Not angry. Not sad. Flat. You open the laptop and the weight is immediate. You sit through standups and say the right things. You solve problems that used to excite you and feel no spark. You tell yourself you're lucky. You know you're lucky. The flatness doesn't care.

Three out of four developers describe themselves as complacent or unhappy at work, according to the 2025 Stack Overflow survey of 49,000 developers. You're not an outlier. You're the pattern.

This piece is about what makes tech burnout different. And what helps that isn't "take a vacation" or "just quit."

Key takeaways:

  • Tech burnout has specific drivers that general burnout advice doesn't address: identity enmeshment, golden handcuffs, the passion expectation, and AI-induced pressure.
  • Cognitive strain, not hours worked, is now the primary burnout driver in knowledge work (Deloitte, 2025).
  • You don't have to quit. Building a second identity through creative hobbies buffers against burnout while you stay in the job.
  • Beginners benefit just as much as experts from creative activities. Skill level is irrelevant. The act of making is what helps.

The numbers nobody talks about at standup

LeadDev surveyed 617 engineering leaders and developers in 2025. Twenty-two percent reported critical burnout. Twenty-four percent moderate. Thirty-three percent low-level. Only 21% qualified as healthy.

That's four out of five engineers running on some degree of depletion.

The environment shifted under everyone. In 2025, 783 tech companies laid off 245,953 people. That's 674 people per day. The people who stayed absorbed the work of those who left. Thirty-eight percent of engineering leaders reported working longer hours. Seven percent worked less.

Microsoft's 2025 Work Trend Index tracked trillions of productivity signals across 31,000 knowledge workers. The finding: workers get interrupted every two minutes. Up to 275 times a day. Sixty percent of the workday goes to email, chat, and meetings. Forty percent is left for the work you were hired to do.

Deloitte's 2025 Workforce Intelligence Report identified a shift. Cognitive strain, not hours worked, is now the primary driver of burnout. That's a first. The problem isn't that you work too much. It's that your brain never gets a clean stretch of focus.

Then there's AI. Seventy-seven percent of employees say AI tools added to their workload, not reduced it. The 2025 Stack Overflow survey found that 66% of developers named their biggest frustration as "AI solutions that are almost right, but not quite." Forty-five percent said debugging AI-generated code takes more time than writing it themselves. A study of 442 developers by Feng, Afroz, and Sarma, accepted at ICSE 2026, confirmed it: GenAI adoption increases burnout through elevated demands. Autonomy and learning resources reduce it. Most organizations increased the demands without the support.

You're not imagining the pressure. The data is clear. The environment got harder and the headcount didn't keep up.

You built your identity around the work

Here's what makes this specific to engineers.

Janna Koretz is a psychologist who founded Azimuth Psychological in Boston. She treats professionals in high-pressure careers. She coined the term "career identity enmeshment," borrowing from family therapy. It means the complete fusion of self with role. The boundary between who you are and what you do dissolves.

When work IS your identity, a bad performance review isn't feedback. It's a threat to your sense of self. Job loss isn't a career transition. It's an existential crisis.

Jonathan Malesic, a former tenured professor who burned out and spent years studying why, wrote in The End of Burnout that burnout is "the result of being stretched across the gap between your ideals for work and the reality of your job."

That gap is wide for senior engineers. You became an engineer because you loved building things. Solving hard problems. Making something work. Now you write design docs. You sit in calibration meetings. You manage expectations across three teams. The work that drew you in makes up maybe 20% of your week.

Patricia Linville, a psychologist at Yale, studied what she called self-complexity. People with multiple distinct self-aspects handle stress better. When you fail in one domain, the other domains act as a buffer. When your only domain is "senior engineer," there's no buffer. A reorg doesn't just threaten your job. It threatens your entire identity.

You didn't just choose engineering. You became it. Your friends are engineers. Your hobbies are technical. Your self-worth runs on output. When the output stops meaning something, the question that surfaces isn't "what should I do next?" It's "who am I without this?"

The comp keeps you from leaving

Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky's prospect theory, published in 1979, found that losses feel roughly twice as powerful as equivalent gains. Applied to career decisions: leaving a $350K job doesn't feel like gaining freedom. It feels like losing $350K.

Every year you stay, the number grows. Equity vesting schedules reduce voluntary turnover by 25 to 40 percent, according to WorldatWork. You stay four years to vest. New grants land. Now you have another four years of unvested stock. The exit keeps moving further away.

Lifestyle creep makes it worse. You built a life that requires this salary. The mortgage. The school. The car. None of it felt extravagant at the time. Each upgrade was reasonable. But the cumulative effect is a lifestyle that requires a specific income bracket to sustain. Now the salary requires the job, and the job is the thing that's depleting you.

Some engineers experience what researchers call "lottery winner syndrome." When stock appreciation creates wealth beyond what you planned for, motivation shifts. Innovation metrics drop. You're physically present but mentally waiting. Not quite working. Not quite free. Stuck in a holding pattern, watching your vest dates like a countdown.

RSU withholding now accounts for more than a quarter of California's income tax withholding growth in 2025-26, according to the state's Legislative Analyst. The scale of equity-based compensation in tech is enormous. So is the psychological weight of walking away from it.

You run the math every quarter. The spreadsheet says stay. Your body says something else.

What makes tech burnout different

Other industries burn people out too. Tech has specific accelerants.

  1. The infinite workday. Gloria Mark at UC Irvine measured it: 23 minutes and 15 seconds to regain full focus after an interruption. Microsoft found you get 275 of them per day. The "flexible" schedule means you're never fully on and never fully off. Slack made you available. Oncall made you responsible. The boundary between work and not-work dissolved, and nobody drew a new one.

  2. The passion expectation. Aaron Kay, a psychologist at Duke, ran eight studies with over 2,400 participants. The finding: people consider exploitation more legitimate when workers are "passionate." Unpaid hours, unreasonable demands, demeaning tasks. All more acceptable if the worker "loves what they do." In South Korea, young workers coined "passion pay" to mock working for free because passion is supposedly its own reward. Tech runs on this assumption. You're supposed to love the work. So when you stop loving it, you treat the problem as personal failure instead of a system that demanded too much.

  3. AI as a new demand. Forty percent of developers report AI-induced imposter syndrome, according to a 2025 Devsu survey. Positive sentiment toward AI tools dropped from over 70% in 2023-24 to 60% in 2025. A Stanford study found employment among junior developers fell 20% between 2022 and 2025. The message is clear: learn the tools or become obsolete. That pressure sits on top of everything else.

  4. Survivor burnout. After every round of layoffs, the survivors inherit the work. Forty-nine percent of layoff survivors report a decline in morale. Some engineers described absorbing projects from entire dissolved teams. The phrase "doing more with less" stopped being a temporary ask. It became the operating model. Some workers are leaving tech entirely for slower, more predictable fields.

You don't have to quit. But you need something that isn't work.

Most burnout advice gives you two options. Push through or leave.

There's a third option. Stay in the job, but build something outside of it that has nothing to do with engineering.

Not a side project. Not an app. Not another thing to optimize. Something useless. Something that exists because you enjoy it.

The science behind a second identity. Linville's self-complexity research showed that people with multiple distinct self-aspects are more resilient. The key word is distinct. "Software engineer" and "side-hustle app developer" are the same identity in different clothes. "Software engineer" and "the person who throws pottery on Saturdays" are two separate pillars. When one takes a hit, the other holds.

Creative hobbies do something rest doesn't. Kevin Eschleman at San Francisco State studied 341 employees in 2014. Creative activities outside of work improved job performance, satisfaction, and problem-solving. The effect went beyond relaxation. Something about creative activity itself produced the benefit. A 2025 scoping review by Cleary and colleagues, published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing, confirmed the pattern: hobbies buffer against depression and burnout through mood regulation, well-being, and social connection.

Why making things with your hands matters. Matthew Crawford has a PhD in philosophy from the University of Chicago. He left his think tank job to become a motorcycle mechanic. In Shop Class as Soulcraft he argues that separating thinking from doing degrades both. Software is pure abstraction. You push symbols around a screen. Your brain craves the tangible. Building something you can hold. Something that resists you. Something that gives physical feedback instead of a green checkmark in CI.

Why pottery beats Netflix. Sabine Sonnentag at the University of Mannheim identified four recovery experiences: psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control. Scrolling gives you relaxation. Maybe. A creative hobby gives you detachment, mastery, and control simultaneously. You can't think about Jira tickets while throwing clay. You're learning something new. You chose to be here. That combination is what makes active hobbies recover what passive rest can't.

You don't have to be good at it. Girija Kaimal at Drexel University measured cortisol levels before and after 45 minutes of art-making. Seventy-five percent of participants showed significant reductions. The finding that matters: beginners benefited just as much as experienced artists. Your skill level is irrelevant. The act of making is what lowers the stress hormones.

Play is the antidote to optimization. Stuart Brown, a psychiatrist who founded the National Institute for Play, completed over 5,000 play history reviews across his career. Play is voluntary. Outside time pressure. Done for its own sake. Engineers are chronically play-deprived because they've optimized every hour. The Saturday afternoon spent on watercolors feels wasteful because it doesn't ship anything. That's the point. It isn't supposed to ship anything.

The trap is turning the hobby into another project. Oliver Burkeman wrote in Four Thousand Weeks: "The hobbyist is a subversive: he insists that some things are worth doing for themselves alone, despite offering no payoffs in terms of productivity or profit." The moment you track progress, set goals, or think about monetizing it, you've recreated the pattern that burned you out. The engineering mindset will try to colonize this space. Resist that.

If you don't know where to start, James Pennebaker at UT Austin spent decades studying expressive writing. Over 100 studies confirmed: writing about emotional experiences for 15 minutes over four days reduces anxiety, stress, blood pressure, and work absences. You don't need talent. You need a notebook and the willingness to write what you're actually feeling instead of what you think you should feel.

What else helps

  1. Complete the stress cycle. Emily and Amelia Nagoski's research showed that removing the stressor doesn't remove the stress. Your body stores it. Physical movement, deep breathing, social connection, and creative expression discharge what accumulated. This needs to happen daily, not once a quarter. I wrote about this in detail in the burnout recovery stages post.

  2. Stop calling yourself lazy. If beating yourself up worked, it would have worked by now. Joe Hudson tracked recovery across hundreds of executives. People who rest without self-judgment recover in three to four months. People who beat themselves up during rest take two to five years. If you're not sure whether you're dealing with burnout or a motivation dip, start here.

  3. Audit the environment, not yourself. Christina Maslach at UC Berkeley identified six workplace factors that drive burnout: workload, control, reward, community, fairness, and values. Check which ones are broken in your situation. If three or more are off, self-care alone won't fix it. The system needs to change.

  4. Notice the emotional flatness. Mattila and colleagues found in 2007 that difficulty identifying emotions correlates strongly with burnout (r=0.41). Engineering culture rewards emotional suppression. You're paid to think, not feel. Over years, that training works too well. You might not know what you're feeling. That's a symptom. Not a personality trait. Creative expression and coaching both work because they force emotional engagement in a space that's safe enough to allow it.

The curiosity is still there

You became an engineer because you loved building things. That impulse is still in there. It's buried under years of sprint planning, perf reviews, and the quiet pressure to perform at a pace that was never sustainable.

The way out isn't necessarily another job. It's noticing what you lost along the way. The curiosity. The play. The part of you that used to make things for no reason at all.

That part isn't gone. It's waiting for you to stop optimizing long enough to hear it.

If the pattern feels familiar, the identity fused to output, the comp that keeps you from moving, the flatness you can't name, that's where having someone outside the pattern helps most. Not to fix you. To see what you're too close to notice. If you're feeling stuck or your decisions keep stalling, this might be why.

I write a few times per month about clarity, decisions, and getting unstuck.

Feeling stuck?

If this resonated, read about how I work with people like you.

Learn about coaching